Jerry8A
New User
Oct 26, 2005, 8:53 PM
Post #11 of 14
(2591 views)
Shortcut
|
Re: [rrobor] Plasma TV Adjustments
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
rrobor Thanks for your return. Cost is certainly an issue with all manufacturers. However, let me share with you the reasons for my query on focus and details. When I purchased my Samsung plasma TV, the published specs exceeded most others that I was interested in (even the more expensive units, although my set was not much cheaper). And with its 12 bit system (others have less), I expected comparable or better performance. Now, as you stated, perhaps I was expecting too much. However, that question can only be answered by the end user. You are probably aware of organizations that publish reviews of TV sets. After I purchased my set, I found the following review (bold type was in their review): “The Samsung SP-R4232 has EDTV resolution but its picture quality would suggest it has even less. Watching a DVD signal over component inputs we were unable to obtain a precise picture. The SR-R4232's 852x480 image didn't come close to matching the clarity we've seen on Panasonic's line of EDTV Plasma Displays. While watching The Fast and the Furious, skin detail was noticeably absent, giving characters a mannequin-like uniform complexion. Since The Fast and the Furious was not the cinematographic accomplishment of the decade, we checked the movie on a Panasonic TH-42PD50U and found that the DVD really did contain skin detail and the Samsung was truly lacking. During the many fast-action scenes the Samsung SP-R4232 couldn't keep pace. Artifacts distracted from the movie. Color, at the default dynamic setting was artificially red. The standard setting was slightly less vivid and the movie setting delivered a fairly realistic picture. Starting from the movie setting and turning down the color setting resulted with much truer picture. Users can individually tweak the red, green, blue, yellow, pink, and white levels in addition to selecting from the standard picture settings. “ So, it seems logical, that plasma TVs do have the capability of performing at a high level, and it is up to the manufacturers as to how creative their design is. Often TV designers, operating within the same budget constraints will have far different outcomes on their efforts. I don’t discount cost as a factor, but as I stated at the beginning, Samsung’s specs would have one think their performance should be superior. Now, when I was shopping for my TV, I did look at the Panasonic and I could see the difference in picture detail and clarity. So, why did I not purchase it? Three reasons: Knowing Samsung had exceptional specs, I was hoping when I got the set home I could adjust it for better performance, hence my forum query. And second, retail stores have their sets adjusted for showroom performance (as you stated). And third, the stand on the Panasonic was too large for where I was going to place the set. Jerry
(This post was edited by Jerry8A on Oct 26, 2005, 8:56 PM)
|